Well,
I feel that I should preface this blog post with a confession: when my advisor
told me last spring that I was going to have to take a class called “Reading,
Writing and Technology” this semester, I was pretty irked about it. Already
having had classes with titles such as “Ethnic Literacy,” “Teaching English,”
“Teaching Writing” and “Technology for Teachers” on my transcript (not to
mention the 17 courses with the letters E-N-G-L in their prefixes on there as
well, which, I can attest, have forced a good amount of the “reading” and
“writing” kinds of skills into my brain), my predictions for this course were
that it was going to be very dull, that the information was going very
redundant, and that attendance points would be my sole motivation for showing
up.
Clearly,
my attitude was less-than ideal.
While
my pre-semester mind-set toward this course was pretty rotten, it only took a
few classes for me to realize that the value of this class was going to extend
way beyond being able to check it off of my required courses list. In the end,
I not only had a much-needed change of heart toward SCED 4200, but even
experienced a bit of a “restoration,” I guess, in terms of my motivations to
and confidences in my ability to be a good teacher.
So,
to state it concisely, my experience in SCED 4200 was awesome. And here is why:
1) For the stuff I LEARNED.
While
this class gave me greater understandings of what the big terms like
“differentiation” and (thank goodness) “critical literacy” mean, the most
valuable learning I feel like I took from this class had to do with the many,
many tools/ideas/skills we were given in order to actually apply those terms
one day. Here were a few of my favorites:
1- The during-reading charts. I
started using some of these in my own reading this semester.
2- So many great texts I want
to read/use one day in my classroom! From the awesome titles presented in our
Book-Talk day to the many great websites we were introduced to (I especially
liked the data visualization websites—way cool).
3- Learning not just that
differentiation should occur in the classroom, but lots of ways to do this. For
instance, for helping ESL students, using lots of visuals with instruction (the
Afrikaans lesson definitely illustrated the importance of that), having them
engage in lots of oral language activities, and encouraging them to write down and
then find out the meanings of three commonly-used words they don’t understand
every day.
4- Encouraging good writing in
all 6-traits with activities like making Valentine’s Day cards for different
audiences (voice), creating “personal dictionaries” of words they don’t know
throughout the semester (word choice) and charting sentence lengths in a paper
(sentence fluency).
5- Teaching students how to
evaluate internet source credibility through activities like the one in which
we had to rank internet sources based on their credibility and then discuss why
we did so with the class.
6- How to encourage good class
discussions by incorporating things like “uptake” (having students comment on
the previous person’s statements), having student-generated questions fuel the
discussion, and having “devil’s advocate” discussions (like we did with the
Logan Dam debate).
7- How to encourage good
small-group discussions through activities like assigning students “strategy-specific
roles” for reading, having mock interviews (I liked the “Oprah Winfrey
interviewing an igneous rock” example) and creating/commenting on other people’s
Facebook pages (which can be used for historical figures, like we did in class,
or for characters in novels).
2) For the stuff I ACQUIRED
(Yes, these subheadings were totally stolen from Gee.)
Along
with the things that were explicitly taught in class, I think I learned just as
much from the fact that the class structure, variety and individualization was
such a great model for how a class should be.
1- For instance, I loved that
class always began with the opportunity to ask questions and that particular
class’s objectives, and that clear Power Points were always used to guide us
through the lesson. Along with its being well-organized,
though, it was also appropriately relaxed. For instance, most everyone seemed
to feel very comfortable sharing their opinions in our class discussions, and,
I noticed, we seemed to be laughing quite a lot (although the fact that we had
a lot of awesome personality in the class definitely contributed to that, too J).
2- I also liked the fact that class
activities were not only frequent but varied.
I don’t think there was ever a day where we weren’t asked to express our ideas
in some way, yet the way in which we were asked to do so (i.e. in writing
personal reflections, by acting out tide cycles, through structured small-group
discussions) was never exactly the same. Also, I loved the fact that the class
assignments were so varied. The blog posts, lesson plans, book-talk
presentations, and self-selected project options offered, I felt, lots of great
ways/options for us to demonstrate our knowledge as well as continue learning.
3- Lastly, I thought that individualized instruction/attention
was definitely modeled in this class. I’ve never had a teacher give my
assignments such great feedback on my assignments, been so willing to work with
students on issues like revision and even bring gluten-free cookies when one
student in a class of 20 can’t eat normal food… Things like these, especially
within the “individualized” category, made participating in class and doing
assignments far more enjoyable and meaningful than just doing so for the grade.
While
I wasn’t so sure about a “Reading, Writing and Technology” class before the
semester began, I’m so glad I got to take the course in this section this
semester! I not only learned/acquired a ton, but enjoyed it, too. (Which
enjoyment, I guess, probably had a lot to do with the fact that I
learned/acquired a lot.) Thanks for an awesome semester!